09-06-2018, 08:06 PM
(09-06-2018, 08:01 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: We have a long history of using civil disobedience in this country and "breaking the rules". It's case by case. I wouldn't have agreed with this if there truly were national security implications, no matter the goal of the rule breaker.
This is very true. Rules are rules, but our society is based upon the idea that unjust rules should be broken. Were it not, we'd still be a British colony.
"A great democracy has got to be progressive, or it will soon cease to be either great or a democracy..." - TR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
