09-07-2018, 11:12 PM
(09-07-2018, 11:06 PM)GMDino Wrote: Nah...everybody knows he's a shoe in.
Unless there is some really big item nobody knows about yet he was guaranteed to be in.
I mean I know y'all just want to ignore everything int he hearing because you already liked him anyway, but it's good to share his responses for those who may be more open minded.
Weird how wrong you are about me so often.
Nighty night!
Actually, he's a mixed bag for me, as I'm not a party affiliated robot. I love his stance on the 2A, I think it's perfectly in line with the framers intent with that amendment. I also prefer a originalist perspective, as the Constitution, with the BoR, is a wonderfully crafted set of documents. I very much dislike his stance on unions and abortion rights, although I think the case of the migrant in detention requesting the government to pay for her abortion is a poor example of this. Much as Kagan and Sotomayor were a mixed bag for me. I just find it amusing that you, and others like you, expect a GOP POTUS to nominate a SCOTUS appointee in line with Democratic party principles. Laughable to say the least.
