09-14-2018, 01:02 PM
(09-14-2018, 12:56 PM)Goalpost Wrote: Garland wasn't nominated because by the time Obama was lame duck, his party was in the minority. If the Dems had won elections then Garland is there. So this is a we lost and didn't get what we wanted argument. Wasn't there a midterm where some Dems didn't want Obama's endorsement and they lost anyway.
The Republicans refused to approve the nomination because they claimed there was an upcoming election and "the will of the voters should decide".
Now there is an election upcoming so shouldn't the approval be delayed to let "the will of the voters to decide" this time also?
