Kavanaugh SCOTUS hearings

[BmorePat87]

(09-17-2018, 11:31 AM)Belsnickel Wrote: https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/california-professor-writer-of-confidential-brett-kavanaugh-letter-speaks-out-about-her-allegation-of-sexual-assault/2018/09/16/46982194-b846-11e8-94eb-3bd52dfe917b_story.html?utm_term=.cabe0eb177ae


The only thing here is that the name is not mentioned previously, and the part from the husband smells like bullshit, particularly raising concerns about SCOTUS.

The lack of a name adds some more skepticism back

(09-17-2018, 11:34 AM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Which begs the question, why did Feinstein sit on this letter that she had back in July?

I'll also ask this, and please just consider the question and not the nature of the allegations.  Is something a person did at the age of 17 really relevant to the person they are at 53?  I'll also add this question, why do we have separate juvenile and adult criminal court processes?

Should have come forward much sooner. In terms of "is it relevant?", I would say it does not make them who they are now, but it certainly should be considered for something as important as SCOTUS as we, traditionally, add a higher level of scrutiny to our top officials.