Kavanaugh SCOTUS hearings

[BmorePat87]

(09-18-2018, 10:59 AM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Sure, to a point.  An even better question here is "is it provable"?  Right now you have the accuser's version against Kavanaugh and his friend's word.  How do you prove an allegation from 35 years ago?  If there is no "proof" other than the accuser's word then I don't see how anyone could logically hold Kavanaugh to account for it.  Every Dem will, using #metoo as a political weapon, but should a logical, fair minded person judge anyone guilty based on a 35 year old accusation with no corroboration?

Certainly cannot be proven at this point in time, which is why I phrased my responses to note my own personal doubt or belief. I would suggest that bringing this up years ago certainly provides some slight degree of corroboration, however small, but, as I said, I have doubts since there was no name given.