09-18-2018, 01:25 PM
(09-18-2018, 01:13 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: In a civil case they'd be assessing responsibility not guilt and the standard is preponderance of evidence.
In most case, a few use the clear and convincing standard. So in this case they would be assessing if Kavanagh was responsible for her assault, instead of Guilty of it? Seems unusual. This just seems like the type of case that innocence should be presumed.