09-24-2018, 05:15 PM
Why does it "have" to be Kavanaugh? Didn't the President have a short list with other names on it? In the past when a SCOTUS nominee was turned down or it appeard they were going to be turned down, didn't the President then offer a new name? Surely a less controversial person could be named and even confirmed before November (with consideration for the GOP election fears), right?