09-25-2018, 09:39 PM
(09-25-2018, 09:33 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: Have they? I'm not being snarky, but I haven't seen that. I did see his roommate say he would get belligerently drunk and that the accuser was a trustworthy person. There's apparently a 3rd accuser set to speak up (but who knows).
Every other news organization refused to print the story because it could not be corroborated. The New Yorker admits in the article itself the story cannot be corroborated. (Please note GMDino, this is how the word is properly used). As for the 3rd party accuser, are you referring to the one that Avenetti is priming for his next run of show appearances? Last I read they are possibly not coming forward.
Quote:I know what's "right" and "decency" go out the window in DC, so I cannot defend Feinstein sitting on this rather than pushing for a real investigation as soon as she found out, but should due diligence not be done just because she sucks?
Depends. What doesn't depend is being able to claim you want a thorough investigation when your own actions show you clearly don't care about that at all. Something about lying in the bed you made comes to mind.
Quote:If he's innocent, it'll remove a blemish.
Dude, please. The damage to the man's reputation is done. Short of Ford coming out and saying she made the whole thing up (which still wouldn't satisfy everyone) you'll get people like Chelsea Handler (an awful human being btw) labeling Kavanaugh a sexual predator for the rest of his days. There is no exoneration from this for him, ever.
