09-26-2018, 09:22 AM
(09-26-2018, 09:09 AM)Belsnickel Wrote: Was that the reason? My understanding was that the reason why the other two news agencies following the story didn't go to print was because the second accuser had an exclusive set up with the New Yorker. It had nothing to do with them not seeing the story as solid. There have also been several statements that have come out corroborating her story. I'm not saying it happened as she is reporting, but to dismiss it so quickly as you do is misguided.
I don't have to dismiss it, the New Yorker article itself does that for me, and anyone else. It flat out says nothing she claimed could be corroborated. Apparently she wasn't even sure it was Kavanaugh until she spent something like six days "memory searching" and speaking to her attorney. This doesn't have the slightest whiff of bullshit to you?
