09-27-2018, 05:42 PM
(09-27-2018, 05:26 PM)GMDino Wrote: I dunno Matt...apparently we aren't as "open minded" as others watching this. I'm sure it's just my bias.
I didn't watch it at all and am not really following it. My commentary is based upon his history and I am just pointing out that it would make it not surprising that he becomes partisan in his defense.
(09-27-2018, 05:29 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Circle jerk aside. I suppose neither of you would confront a person and/or their motives for trying to ruin your life. He described exactly what is happening, but he's not "allowed" to do so because he's a judge.
He described exactly what is happening? I see some opinions in his statements, which is fine, he is entitled to them. But opinions are just that and the subjective nature of them means they aren't going to be exact. Also, as I stated above, my commentary about him being a partisan actor is just based on his history and really has nothing to do with the allegations against him other than explaining his defense methods. I have been saying this since before the first allegation came out against him. He is a political operative, which is not something I want to see on the SCOTUS.
"A great democracy has got to be progressive, or it will soon cease to be either great or a democracy..." - TR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
