Kavanaugh SCOTUS hearings

[Benton]

(10-04-2018, 10:55 AM)bfine32 Wrote: And I've always said it is not up to the individual to decide what does/does not impact National Security. We pay folks to do that and classify document accordingly.

Which is why I wouldn't agree the "any person willfully sharing any information contained in this report should be brought up on charges."


As you say, we pay people to declassify accordingly. And from what we've seen lately, they're doing a very partisan job of that.

(10-04-2018, 10:57 AM)michaelsean Wrote: I don't think investigations like this are ever made public, so it would be more of an exception.  Could end up being a bi-partisan as Senators from both parties are split.

At the federal level, I can't say as there is a lot more information that never gets made public. But, generally, any time public dollars are used to investigate, any report generated from those investigations is a public document. And, unless it's national security, that's the way it should be. As I said, I can't see why stories about drunken teens would be a part of that.