10-05-2018, 09:55 AM
(10-05-2018, 09:08 AM)michaelsean Wrote: I don't think it's the presumption of innocence as much as it is zero corroborating evidence. I'm surely not going to state this didn't happen, but there is zero evidence it did. Add in the lack of detail so that someone can defend themselves, and it's tough.
There is circumstantial evidence, just not video/dna/eye witness evidence. The calendar entry on July 12 1982 and her therapists notes both corroborate her story.
