Kavanaugh SCOTUS hearings

[Dill]

(10-04-2018, 06:35 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Dill Wrote: 5. You appear not to have noticed that Kav's yearbook helps substantiate Ford's claims--and certainly that he lied under oath.  Asked if he had ever attended a party such as that described by Ford, with "PJ" and Judge and heaving drinking, he said unequivocally 'NO.'  But his own calender puts him at such a party with the afore-named partiers.  That's why they "spent time talking about his year book."
..................................................................................................................................................................................
5. I saw screenshots of Kav's yearbook and as I've offered to others. Share your empirical evidence that he lied or else quit trying to push opinion off as fact.

6. It can "sound like" to you all you want. What you "sound like" to me is that you could give 2 shits about the rule of law. You've made up you mind and no lack of evidence is going to change it. It's that cognitive dissonance I was referring to earlier.   You and others just cannot admit to yourselves how despicable you've been throughout this process. 

Have you ever read To Kill a Mockingbird ?

Haven't read To Kill a Mockingbird, but I saw the movie.  And you speak of "lack of evidence." If a man is falsely accused of rape in a movie/book, is that "evidence" that Kavanaugh is falsely accused as well?

"Cognitive dissonance" refers to holding incompatible beliefs. No point in bringing up the term unless you can specify the incompatible beliefs. Danger there, for Trump defenders who claim to be "conservatives."

I have answered your questions about the importance of an FBI investigation, how it specifically differs from Senate questioning. Your replies to my explanation were simply petulant ("They just didn't need Ford to tell them again that she doesn't remember anything.") So YOU decide I'VE made up MY mind and "nothing is going to change it."  Can't admit how "despicable" I have been, explaining how to sort out relevant evidence.  And all these opinions you don't bother to substantiate, you demandI "share empirical evidence" and "quit trying to push off opinion as fact."
................................................................................................
LOL opinions and facts. Do the following points rest upon OPINION, FACTS or EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE?

From the transcript of Kavanaugh's testimony under oath:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/national/wp/2018/09/27/kavanaugh-hearing-transcript/?utm_term=.5a60edc21f0b

MITCHELL: Have you reviewed every entry that is in these calendars of May, June, July and August of 1982?

KAVANAUGH: I have.

MITCHELL: Is there anything that could even remotely fit what we’re talking about, in terms of Dr. Ford’s allegations?

KAVANAUGH: No.

...........................................................................................................

It is my opinion that Kavanaugh said "NO" to Mitchell's question.  What is your opinion?

And it is my opinion that the July 1st event described on Kavanaugh's calender below does "remotely" fit a description of a house where boys were drinking--including PJ and Judge as Ford alleged.  It's my opinion that Kavanaugh can read his own calender. What does the calender say in your opinion?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2018/09/27/kavanaugh-is-pressed-key-july-entry-his-calendar-only-point/?utm_term=.067fe704b005