10-05-2018, 09:28 PM
(10-05-2018, 09:09 PM)fredtoast Wrote: And I gave you my answer. Read it very slowly and see if you can figure it out.
I know you struggle with answers longer than one word, but this one really isn't that tough to figure out.
Not as much as you struggle with giving a one word answer. I read it slowly and deciphered that you think that Kavs testifying under oath to defend himself against being accused of a crime should not be extended the presumption of innocence.
I did notice you failed to quote or answer my request for clarification on your view of civil cases.
Thanks for that"counselor".