Kavanaugh SCOTUS hearings

[*michaelsean*]

(10-05-2018, 05:48 PM)Dill Wrote: I wouldn't say there was ZERO evidence.  Ford's testimony is evidence. The question is only how much weight it can be given and to what degree it can be corroborated.  That is why questions can be legitimately asked about Ford's background, when she made the allegations, to whom, whether there are inconsistencies in her account over time, etc.

And it is not true that Kavanaugh cannot defend himself.  He can deny the allegation outright, point to his record, call on character witnesses, and the like.  "Lack of detail," to the degree there is such, is to Kavanaugh's advantage.

That’s kinda why I wrote “corroborating “ after zero.

You can’t even present an alibi because you don’t know what day it was supposed to have occurred. Maybe you can’t anyway because of the amount of time that has passed, but it would be nice to have a date. I’m still trying to find out if she said different years. Haven’t had time to really look.