Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Was this a bad year to replace Marv?
#74
(01-10-2019, 08:44 AM)HarleyDog Wrote: You can be confident that he won’t be any worse. ThumbsUp

There were plenty of good years we should have parted with Marvin, but never a bad one. Regardless who we get, the FO is going to feel pressure to turn this around quickly. I’m not so sold that the next guy has job security. The fans nor city can handle another 16yrs of crap.

People on here act like Marvin was the worst coach ever and that any hire will be better by default. That's not really the case.

In the playoffs he was bad.

But, he came into a 2-14 team and had us what 8-8 the next year. Our rosters were greatly improved under him. We were way more competitive during the regular seasons.

It was time to part ways with Marvin, but there are worse coaches out there and if you look at 2016...Pederson was a hit that year. ALL of the other coaches hired have been fired already. ALL of them.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Was this a bad year to replace Marv? - THE PISTONS - 01-10-2019, 10:31 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)