The Making of the Fox News White House

[*bfine32*]

(03-12-2019, 02:22 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: I don't think "we have no evidence but it could be a problem, so lets burden people" is a legitimate argument, so I don't see any reason to meet halfway on voter suppression. 

I wouldn't go as far as to say there is no evidence that those ineligible to vote have voted in the past

But one will use the words they want to support their point:

For instance I use responsibility and voter ID

You use worthy and suppression.

It's a fallacy known as appeal to emotion.

Do you think there should be qualifications to exercise your 2nd amendment right?