03-12-2019, 05:40 PM
(03-12-2019, 05:25 PM)bfine32 Wrote: I wouldn't go as far as to say there is no evidence that those ineligible to vote have voted in the past
But one will use the words they want to support their point:
For instance I use responsibility and voter ID
You use worthy and suppression.
It's a fallacy known as appeal to emotion.
Do you think there should be qualifications to exercise your 2nd amendment right?
I appreciate the use of a rhetorical question to make your point that no right is absolute (it was a good example), which I agree with, but as I said, I don't value what I view as attempted voter suppression.
It's something we just won't find common ground on. It is what it is and I say this sincerely and without any snark intended.
![[Image: ulVdgX6.jpg]](http://i.imgur.com/ulVdgX6.jpg)
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)