04-03-2019, 03:30 PM
(04-03-2019, 03:13 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: So you're in favor of abolishing the Senate now too? Wow, you far left types can't stop finding things about this country you want to utterly change.
No. I have already said that I do not mind the states getting votes based on seats in Congress. I am just against the "all or nothing" allocation of EC votes.
(04-03-2019, 03:21 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Except it already does and it always has. The process in inequitable in this fashion by design. I again return to the example of the Senate. the mere fact that it exists is sufficient proof that the Framers did not want a purely representative democracy. I again return to the point of the tyranny of the majority. These features you take issue with are by design.
But the existence of the House of representatives proves that the founders wanted each individual voice to be represented based on separate districts. They did not make a rule that every representative from a state had to vote exactly the same.
So if we are going by the will of the framers we would have the EC but not the "all or nothing" allocation of delegates, correct?
