04-04-2019, 08:03 PM
(04-04-2019, 07:42 PM)bfine32 Wrote: This is great and I think we're making some real headway. I think I now see the problem and perhaps we can work toward a solution:
Trump says: "And they say the noise causes cancer, you tell me that one, OK?"
Fred only sees: "Noise causes cancer" becomes emotional because he didn't consider the whole sentence uttered; simply the part he wanted to focus on and asserts Trump said "Noise causes Cancer"
bfine says: "But you are admitting he didn't actually say Windmill Noise causes cancer; he was merely 'citing authority'"
Fred only sees "But you are admitting he didn't actually say Windmill Noise causes cancer" becomes emotional because he didn't consider the whole sentence uttered; simply the part he wanted to focus on, and asserts bfine is lying.
I absolutely considered the entire sentence. I even explained WHY he said it in order to back up my position. If he had just said "I believe the noise causes cancer." it would have sounded more ridiculous. But by claiming there is a group out there (with some implied authority) who say it he is trying to make it sound more believable.
And for some reason you still refuse to give me your explanation of why he said it. Wonder why that is?
