05-23-2019, 06:22 PM
(05-23-2019, 05:29 PM)bfine32 Wrote: At least they haven't fallen into the tramp of sentencing before the trial.
As to the rest: I find it moronic that you "cannot" introduce previous acts comparable to those mentioning; without being insulted. There was no intent to excuse Trump's actions; simply to point out it has happened prior as I clearly said what dude is accused of sounds terrible. I assume no one brought up Colin Powell's emailing habits when discussing Hillary. I get we all do it as a community, but what do you suggest one does if he wants to remind the audience that there might be precedent to a current action?
Again, where is the precedent Obama set?
Just saying, 'yeah, it happened' isnt really clearing anything up.