Potential Memorial Day Pardons

[*bfine32*]

(05-24-2019, 02:01 PM)hollodero Wrote: He said it sends a disturbing message, to the troops and the public and other countries. There is a clear and non-inane reasoning for that stance. 
Why are you so keen on twisting his words and then call all of our comments absolutely inane for not falling in line with that distorted portrayal?

No intent to twist. much less keen to do it.

This is just probably the only place you could send a disturbing message and not expect the reader to be disturbed. I stated Matt said troops should be disturbed  instead of saying the troops were sent a disturbing (we're not sure disturbing to whom) and at least 2 people plus the OP call foul. Yet in the same thread one word of a 36 word point made by me is focused on to try to bastardize the point and we get "crickets" or worse yet affirmation.  

Answer me a question: Would you expect Troops, the public, and other countries to be disturbed over a disturbing message?
"I going to send you these disturbing images, but I don't expect you to be disturbed by them"

A a troop; I'm disturbed by many thinks POTUS says/does and this is one; I've said as much earlier. WTS, it's ridiculous and really not worth further discussion