Potential Memorial Day Pardons

[Dill]

(05-24-2019, 10:48 AM)bfine32 Wrote: There are two different scenarios in question:

Matt's OP was how Military folk should be mad about Trump considering pardoning this operative. I simply asserted it wasn't the first time Military folks should be mad about such thing with a reference to manning.

Then Dill chimed in with OK, you may have a point there but.....no President has influenced prior and I provided the Bergdahl circus as proof.

Such distortion. I never said no president has EVER exercised undue influence. I only cited/linked to the concerns of military officers and commentators regarding Trump's undue influence.

Then you threw up your Bergdahl circus as "proof" Obama had done the same--except, as I explain, it is not proof of any such thing. The Bergdahl case is IN FACT another example of Trump's undue influence. At this point is is clear that you do not know what "undue influence" means as a legal term.

Plus you are angry that "we allowed" another soldier to be executed in Iraq.  Wow.

(05-24-2019, 10:48 AM)bfine32 Wrote: The rest is typical Dill but I felt compelled to address the bold, because it is really what is going to cause the demise of this forum. You took 1 word of a 36 word point to try to suggest someone said something they did not.

"Typical Dill" means defining terms, explaining how the law works and providing reasons in a logical sequence--for which you are unable to respond in kind. It never means bailing when the going gets tough.

Typical Bfine means throwing in unrelated issues you are angry about, then suggesting some unnamed someone said some undefined something,
all which is prep for the moment you decide others (the ones who eschew "undefined somethings" to cite legal process as they explain and refute) cannot be reasoned with, and bail to safety insisting you've retained some high moral ground.