05-29-2019, 01:18 AM
(05-28-2019, 08:07 PM)bfine32 Wrote: As I said: provide the post, in which, I said I didn't use the term owner. I purposely left it out because to some the tree is more substantial than the forest.
Was the forest different because you did or didn't call the forest the owners? No. So congrats on undermining your own point, I guess?
Quote:Folks at that university answer to people aka the "owners".
Cool. Four pages of you bloviating about the owners to finally admit the "owners" are people who don't actually own the university, but fellow employees who are most likely administrators. And the "people" who chose Pence as a commencement speaker may or may not have any authority over the faculty.
Quote:You keep asking questions yet wont answer the one question posed to you to clarify your post:
Who was the "other employee" that ok'd the Pence speech?
I answered your question 4 days and 3 pages ago. Post # 95.
You haven't answered who the owner is or what policy or part of their contract the staff violated. Because you can't punish them unless their was a violation of a policy or their contract. Then the next step would be the policy on progressive discipline because a first time offense is probably nothing more than a verbal counseling session.
And your not sure if they violated a morality clause that you don't know if they have. And you don't think what they did is immoral, but if it isn't then the person who may have wrote the morality code you don't know they have is an idiot. Whew! And you call others desperate! LOL
