Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Lol, Jim Acosta..
#11
(07-02-2019, 10:44 AM)GMDino Wrote: Of course it does.  If we "lol" at the reporter who then we can shift focus from the question.

If we accuse a reporter who asked a legitimate question of simply wanting to help his book sales then we can ignore the question.

That's what the article in the OP does.

Source is important. Both the sender and the receiver. 
[Image: bfine-guns2.png]

[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]





Messages In This Thread
Lol, Jim Acosta.. - SunsetBengal - 07-01-2019, 07:41 PM
RE: Lol, Jim Acosta.. - bfine32 - 07-01-2019, 08:04 PM
RE: Lol, Jim Acosta.. - BmorePat87 - 07-01-2019, 08:37 PM
RE: Lol, Jim Acosta.. - NATI BENGALS - 07-01-2019, 11:44 PM
RE: Lol, Jim Acosta.. - CJD - 07-01-2019, 11:50 PM
RE: Lol, Jim Acosta.. - Dill - 07-02-2019, 12:01 AM
RE: Lol, Jim Acosta.. - Benton - 07-02-2019, 12:10 AM
RE: Lol, Jim Acosta.. - BakertheBeast - 07-02-2019, 05:37 AM
RE: Lol, Jim Acosta.. - bfine32 - 07-02-2019, 10:26 AM
RE: Lol, Jim Acosta.. - GMDino - 07-02-2019, 10:44 AM
RE: Lol, Jim Acosta.. - bfine32 - 07-02-2019, 10:48 AM
RE: Lol, Jim Acosta.. - GMDino - 07-02-2019, 10:58 AM
RE: Lol, Jim Acosta.. - bfine32 - 07-02-2019, 11:02 AM
RE: Lol, Jim Acosta.. - Dill - 07-02-2019, 09:20 PM
RE: Lol, Jim Acosta.. - bfine32 - 07-02-2019, 09:31 PM
RE: Lol, Jim Acosta.. - Dill - 07-03-2019, 02:51 AM
RE: Lol, Jim Acosta.. - BakertheBeast - 07-10-2019, 06:12 AM
RE: Lol, Jim Acosta.. - Benton - 07-02-2019, 12:05 PM
RE: Lol, Jim Acosta.. - bfine32 - 07-02-2019, 01:07 PM
RE: Lol, Jim Acosta.. - Dill - 07-02-2019, 06:25 PM
RE: Lol, Jim Acosta.. - Dill - 07-02-2019, 09:23 PM
RE: Lol, Jim Acosta.. - Goalpost - 07-02-2019, 01:21 PM
RE: Lol, Jim Acosta.. - bfine32 - 07-02-2019, 01:31 PM
RE: Lol, Jim Acosta.. - BakertheBeast - 07-03-2019, 04:57 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)