08-09-2019, 06:41 PM
(08-09-2019, 06:36 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: The social media post was from the person who went to the house to potentially buy it, not the officer. The officer did not post any of these objects on social media or anywhere else. That's why these two cases are such a good parallel, the words or objects in question were completely private until made public by outside parties.
Ah. See, I didn't read all that. Still, my position on what to do remains the same. Just like with Strzok, investigate whether his work was influenced. But if it isn't he shouldn't be fired, which is unlike Strzok.
"A great democracy has got to be progressive, or it will soon cease to be either great or a democracy..." - TR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
