09-16-2019, 02:45 PM
(09-14-2019, 12:07 AM)Nebuchadnezzar Wrote: In my opinion,
It's all about the commas. It is written that way to be a list, not a continuation of the sentence.
1. A well regulated Militia,
1a. Being necessary to the security of a free state,
2. The right of the people to bear Arms,
2a. Shall not be infringed.
It is against the law to own an Assault Rifle unless you have permission from the government to own one. An AR-15 is not an Assault Rifle and the AR doesn't stand for Assault Rifle, it stands for Armilite Rifle, just like the AK in the AK 47 stands for Avtomat Kalasghnikova, the initials of the creator of the rifle.
The AR-15, Mini 14 and the M1A are all the same...pretty much. It's just the AR-15 looks scary.
A balanced breakfast, being necessary for the maintaining of good health, the right of the people to eat breakfast shall not be infringed.
As worded do you need to have a balanced breakfast if you eat breakfast? Also, as is commonly ignored by gun grabbers, the militia was considered to be all men of fighting age, this was upheld by the SCOTUS in the 18th century. Also ignored is that "well regulated" as used during that time meant "in good working order".
Please note I know you're in agreement, I just didn't feel like feeding the trolls.
(09-14-2019, 12:55 AM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: Is a M16 or M4 an assault rifle?
Assault rifle includes the ability of selective fire. No post NFA rifle has this ability. An AR15 is functionally no different than a Mini-14, but no one is talking about confiscating them. I'm glad Beto let the mask finally slip though. We never have to hear the obvious lie that the Dems don't want to take away your guns. Both Biden and Robert have said it now and no one on that stage made a peep to contradict Robert's statement.
