Kavanaugh SCOTUS hearings

[Dill]

(09-17-2019, 09:08 AM)BmorePat87 Wrote: The report points out that the first accuser gave the names of 25 people to the FBI who could corroborate her story, none of which the FBI reached out to, even as many tried to contact the FBI on their own. Two agents told her that her story was credible but they had their hands tied until they were authorized to move forward. Grassley, railroading the confirmation forward, would claim that there was no corroboration to the story.

The sham investigation is the story, and it is sad to see toxic partisanship and false narratives being used to again derail any attempts to have a fair investigation into someone who can serve in a vital role for life.

We live in an age of misinformation and twisted narratives and that is apparent in the need we are seeing to use dishonesty to further attack the free press and rule of law.

(09-17-2019, 09:23 AM)GMDino Wrote: Exactly.
The same group of people demanding the press be 100% accurate and perfect at all times attacks them for correcting any mistakes and support a man who deliberately lies to them almost all the time.

When the gaslight is low enough, Trump and the NYT can have equal credibility.

all 'butthurt' over hillary's loss.  No need to read further. . . .