Kavanaugh SCOTUS hearings

[BmorePat87]

(09-17-2019, 11:01 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Pretty much this.  Also the NYT's did themselves no favors by completely flubbing the initial story.  If you're dealing with a hyper sensitive issue that you know is going to cause a major stir would you not triple, quadruple check your story, run it by several people, before finally publishing it?  We've had discussions about the falling standards of journalism, some accusations of which are fair and some are not.  You'd think if you're the worlds most respected organ of the profession you'd take extreme pains to avoid providing the profession's detractors with more ammunition.

They flubbed the story of Ramirez's investigation being handcuffed and inadequate?