09-18-2019, 11:18 AM
(09-18-2019, 01:07 AM)BmorePat87 Wrote: They flubbed the story of Ramirez's investigation being handcuffed and inadequate?
Yeah, by making an enormous, and basic, error they completely flubbed their reporting of this story. 'Zona understands this, I honestly don't get why you don't.
(09-18-2019, 09:02 AM)GMDino Wrote: I'll repeat myself:
Some of you want 100% accuracy and perfect reporting or you will throw the entire organization and all od media under the bus as "helping Trump prove his point" but you accept every lie he tells you.
Nah, I'll settle for baseline competence. If I made such a basic error in an investigation I'd be subject to significant discipline. You don't get to make errors of that magnitude at the top of your profession.
Quote:It's sad rom people I thought might be smarter than that.
As to the story itself I'd also think many of you would believe in further investigations if new information was made available. You certainly wanted Benghazi and "her emails" continuously investigated.
Except this isn't new information. It also comes from a Clinton confidant and it details an incident the victim states they have no memory of. Quite the smoking gun. But, as you say, please feel free to investigate it, House Judiciary Committee.
