Kavanaugh SCOTUS hearings

[*bfine32*]

(09-18-2019, 11:38 AM)Belsnickel Wrote: Good grief there has been a lot of bickering on this one. I think the important thing here is that there should be an agreement that if something were to come up that substantiated previous claims or were new allegations for someone, not just Kavanaugh, after they were confirmed to office that it would be entirely proper for that person to be held accountable for those allegations and/or perjury.

The dismissal of the idea that any further investigation into such things is irrelevant is really what seemed to cause some consternation among some board members.

Nah, consternation came because nothing new was introduced. NYT just wanted to rehash old stuff to rile up their base and apparently 2020 presidential Candidates. And I stated this stinks of double jeopardy; but was then told I don't know what double jeopardy is.