09-18-2019, 02:23 PM
(09-18-2019, 12:11 PM)GMDino Wrote: Well except you insisting that an article about the FBI should be about about the House Judiciary Committee.
Except that's not what I said. But expecting you to be fair about this is obviously hoping for far too much.
(09-18-2019, 12:20 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: Because I actually read the story.
Yeah, I did too. Just because "x" "witnesses weren't contacted doesn't mean an investigation wasn't done.
(09-18-2019, 12:27 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: I'm pretty disappointed that your response turned to personal insults. You're struggling to stay on topic and are jumping around from non sequitur to non sequitur, presumably in an attempt to hide the fact that you're lost due to your unwillingness to even read the article you've now spent a day criticizing.
Oh well...
Literally scanned my post and saw not a hint of personal insults. I'm sincerely hoping you're not turning into one of those people. I too am disappointed you don't get the point I'm making when others have seemed to grasp it with no issue. I'm fine with calling it a day on the back and forth though as it seems to have reached the stage of being pointless.
