09-18-2019, 02:26 PM
(09-18-2019, 01:20 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Nah, consternation came because nothing new was introduced. NYT just wanted to rehash old stuff to rile up their base and apparently 2020 presidential Candidates. And I stated this stinks of double jeopardy; but was then told I don't know what double jeopardy is.
The credibility crushing error aside, this is my main issue with this. This is not new information. Not only is it nothing new it's coming from a Clinton confidant (a fact that not a single person has addressed in this thread) and the victim says they have zero recollection of the event. Based on these two, indisputable, facts alone this doesn't seem like a story worth any serious consideration. But, as I said, the Dems can use their committees to further investigate this if they think there's something there. There's literally nothing stopping them.
