Kavanaugh SCOTUS hearings

[BmorePat87]

(09-18-2019, 07:15 PM)bfine32 Wrote: To be fair I feel it's a reach to call either a personal insult especially when framed "In this instance"; it's not like he dismissed you as a troll or anything. I just asked which was worse

That's not new information. Folks were totally aware of who was and wasn't interviewed during the confirmation. to include those that collaborated Ramirez' story. Here's a story from over a year ago stating as such:
https://www.denverpost.com/2018/10/02/deborah-ramirez-fbi-brett-kavanaugh-investigation/

It's not loaded; it's a simple question. The point of the investigation was to determine the worthiness of a SJ to sit the bench, some just thought it should be a witch hunt.

I simply asked your thoughts on 2020 Dems reaction after this "ground breaking" article. I accidentally said Hernandez instead of Ramirez.

No need for question mark It is cool 

I was wrong then, the actual new information was that the FBI did not respond to some of the potential witnesses when they contacted them. I still do not understand the need to characterize it as you did.

If you now acknowledge that the scope of the investigation was to determine his background and not to see if he committed that crime, why characterize that as if it exonerated him?

Like I've said multiple times, all of the information revealed regarding the limitations warrants an independent look at what went down.