09-27-2019, 11:42 AM
(09-27-2019, 11:26 AM)bfine32 Wrote: What is funny is how folks take issue with the proper term. The whistleblower doesn't not appear to have first hand knowledge of the incidents and has stated as much. Does that mean the information provided by him/her cannot be proven true and correct? No. Does it make the whistleblower a firsthand witness of the incidents? No.
I truly don't know what/why you are arguing.
I am not arguing about anything. I just think it is funny that some people like you are obsessing over the term "hearsay" when every police report is also "hearsay".
Why keep obsessing over a term like that when it means zero in context of the investigation. The complaint is based on first hand eyewitness reports. When you report that you have been mugged that is "hearsay" in the officers report an warrant, but it is based on first hand eyewitness testimony.
Any defense attorney obsessing over how that warrant and report were "hearsay" would be laughed out of court, but the echo chamber has convinced all the Trump supporters that this is a crucial point to make.
