09-27-2019, 06:48 PM
(09-27-2019, 12:17 PM)bfine32 Wrote: I'm not obsessing. Just wanted to point I that I'd heard early in the process the Whistleblower was going on 2nd hand info and obviously he/she was. It does add a second layer to the information. Seems some may be obsessing over ways to say that he/she gained the information otherwise. Would it be less "obsessive' if I said second-hand information instead of hearsay?
I have commended the whistleblower for coming forward and am sure his/her second hand information can be verified. Perhaps your comments should be directed toward a Trump supporter who is obsessing over what the echo chamber has convinced them of.
You were a scout. Your job was to provide intel to the commander. The commander acted upon your intel. Is it safe to say your commander acted upon hearsay or second hand info?
