09-28-2019, 12:33 AM
(09-27-2019, 08:57 PM)michaelsean Wrote: No the people who told the whistleblower would be the scouts. No reason to use second hand information if you can hear from the original people. I have no problem using the whistleblower’s report as a launching point, but I would have a big problem using it as actual evidence.
That’s my point. The whistle blower acted on the reports he received the same way a commander would act on second hand info from his scouts.
An inquiry is nothing more than a launching point.
