09-28-2019, 12:59 AM
(09-28-2019, 12:38 AM)bfine32 Wrote: Deduce whatever you want. I have 0 idea where you get that I've discredited the information. In the question you asked you said "hearsay" and "second hand" and I've already said use whatever term makes you feel better; but that's what the information I gave my Commander in the hypothetical you provided and it's exactly what this whistleblower received.
Did you give your commander info that wasn’t credible? If it was credible, did the commander ever dismiss it because it was secondhand?
The answer to both is no.
Any attempt to dismiss the info as hearsay is simply an attempt to discredit the info as unreliable. Hell, every intel brief Trump receives is hearsay or secondhand, but for some reason the White House doesn’t call his briefings hearsay or secondhand info. Why do you think that is? (Warning: rhetorical question I don’t expect you to answer because we both know the answer already and I’m not interested in BS.)
