Whistle-Blower’s Complaint Is Said to Involve Multiple Acts by Trump

[BmorePat87]

(10-07-2019, 08:48 PM)Crazyjdawg Wrote: This may be the ring wing media talking point, but since we have the transcript, does a second whistleblower for the same phone call really matter?

It takes away the Right's "It was second hand knowledge/hearsay" argument away, but that was taken away when the transcript was released anyway. 

Did the second whistleblower provide more context under which the call was made, rather than the actual content? (I.E., does he have some information that would suggest that the call was made with the pretext of withholding the money or something?)

I would say that it does matter for two reasons:

1) The transcript is not verbatim 

2) The hearsay argument is still being used to dismiss the whistleblower despite the WH admitting it