11-11-2019, 06:10 PM
(11-11-2019, 05:44 PM)fredtoast Wrote: If Bob had first hand knowledge then the story is a first hand account of what happened.
The whole issue of "second hand" is just a red herring. If a police officer files a warrant based on a direct eyewitness statement no one would be attacking that as "second hand". Instead it is considered direct eye witness evidence. It would be false to claim that the police did not have anything but "second hand" evidence or "hearsay".
But what if the policeman were a Democrat?
LOL GOTCHA!!