11-11-2019, 07:35 PM
(11-11-2019, 06:28 PM)6andcounting Wrote: Of course police can get warrants on credible firsthand witness testimony. That's not secondhand info - that's firsthand info straight from a witness.
So of course whistleblowers can write reports on credible firsthand witness testimony. That's not second hand info - that's firsthand info straight from a witness.
Now do you see why the identity of the whistleblower it is all just a red herring. The identity is meaningless. What matters is the evidence. The FoxNews/Right wing media squealing about the political interest of the whistleblower is just to deflect the attention of the rubes away from the actual evidence.
How silly would it be for a criminal to try and use the defense of "That policeman wrote that warrant based direct eye-witness testimony just because he doesn't like me."
