11-14-2019, 09:29 PM
(11-14-2019, 07:22 PM)6andcounting Wrote: I think this is a fair way for me to leave off this thread. Cheers!
"Hearsay can be much better evidence than direct."
— Abigail Marone (@abigailmarone) November 13, 2019
Uh ??
So not only are the Democrats ADMITTING their entire impeachment sham is based off of hearsay, but now they're trying to defend it. What a joke! pic.twitter.com/14oYqp2UGJ
I don't understand the whole hearsay thing. Didn't Sondland say it was a quid pro quo? Wasn't he someone that was directly involved? And why aren't we hearing from more direct people? the answer to that is because the White House (Trump) is preventing them from testifying. So Republicans could make it so we have the people directly involved testify to what occurred. Republicans could put them on the stand. But they aren't. Why would that be?
"A great democracy has got to be progressive, or it will soon cease to be either great or a democracy..." - TR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
