Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
What changed in the running game
#45
(12-13-2019, 06:20 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: Thank you, I find this thread refreshing until I read Pistons posts. Just the same thing over and over, just cause we see 
something positive to take from the team doesn't mean we are happy with being 1-12 for heck sake.

There are very few positives to take from the team this year. The improvements are basically that they're not on historically bad pace offensively and defensively which they were for the 1st half of the year. With the improvements, they're not even a below average team. They're terrible.

They need about 6-8 upgraded starters to be legit.

The offensive line? 4 of the starters grades are below 60 with some in the 40's on PFF. And Hopkins was hovering around 60 last time I checked.

We essentially need 5 new offensive lineman...although Hopkins may be passable at Center.

Now I'll let you all go back to gushing about how great Turner and the offensive coaches are. At 1-12 we're obviously on the cusp of greatness!
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
What changed in the running game - Au165 - 12-13-2019, 10:16 AM
RE: What changed in the running game - J24 - 12-13-2019, 02:44 PM
RE: What changed in the running game - THE PISTONS - 12-14-2019, 02:17 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 7 Guest(s)