03-30-2020, 10:04 AM
(03-30-2020, 08:21 AM)6andcounting Wrote: If they had a particular reason to believe it could be spread they would have posted it as evidence. Instead they said there was no evidence.
It was a Tweet that parroted Chinese propaganda and misled everyone who read it. Nothing more, nothing less.
"Parroting" does not include a warning that human to human transmission is always a concern. Parroting would leave that out, because it is precisely a "particular reason to believe it could be spread," regardless of "no evidence" at the moment.
And whom, exactly, would that factual report "mislead"?
Certainly not public health professionals. Whom then?