03-30-2020, 01:47 PM
(03-30-2020, 08:21 AM)6andcounting Wrote: If they had a particular reason to believe it could be spread
Like evidence? Fifteen days into the outbreak and five days after determining the etiology they didn’t have evidence.
Quote:they would have posted it as evidence. Instead they said there was no evidence.
How can you post evidence you don’t have?
It’s kinda like the police and a murder suspect. “His mom says he didn’t do it, but it’s always a concern when you find a suspect at the scene of the crime. We’re gonna keep looking for evidence “
Quote:It was a Tweet that parroted Chinese propaganda and misled everyone who read it. Nothing more, nothing less.
And 10 days after warning it could be spread from human to human despite what China said and more research was needed or a total of 25 days after the first cases of pneumonia were reported and 15 days after determining the etiology was a novel coronavirus the WHO formally published it was spread from human to human.
There’s not a single public health organization tasked with preparing for pandemics that was fooled by that tweet. Because they don’t base their preparations upon tweets.
This is nothing more than the right wing media attempting to stir controversy.
It’s the Benghazi of pandemics.
Bottom line, the WHO informed the world this novel coronavirus was spread via human to human contact in approximately 3 weeks of its existence.