04-19-2020, 09:50 AM
(04-19-2020, 07:54 AM)6andcounting Wrote: It's hard to disagree with the actions and precautions taken in this particular instance. As I've said, I think the government ultimately did what they had to is this case. My worry - and that what was my question was about - is the precedent it sets and how easily everyone was to control. Those who disagree and are protesting (who I think are dumb in this case) have been stamped out with relative ease. So sure I disagree with the protestors, but I don't like the government have the kind of power and control they have exhibited here. I myself don't have a good answer to my own question as it's hard to look at the question in context when I don't have a particular problem with the government's action in this situation.
A state needs authority. If one doesn't like their authority, there are elections to vote for persons with a different approach. But when everyone still should be free to do dumb stuff that threatens the community, then this is not freedom. Not for those that get infected and possibly die because some folks won't respect sensible measures. Many seem to confuse freedom with recklessness and egocentrism. In fact it comes with responsibility.
Generally, I'd say folks need to listen to actual experts more. Which is hard, since your country is so divided and so many would believe Trump over everyone on any topic. But these experts and their recommendations could make one determine if measures are appropriate or over the top.
Admittedly, I live in a country where though we usually dislike our politicians very much, we still trust them to act reasonable and in good faith in times like those, and that their decisions are shaped by expertise. Makes it easier to see it that way.
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)