04-28-2020, 02:43 PM
(04-28-2020, 12:43 AM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: If I gave you funds to buy PPE vs. if I gave you supplies of PPE only you would argue funds and supplies are the same thing based upon a definition that doesn’t apply to the context in which the words were used in order to fill the next 30-60 minutes with an asinine argument just for the sake of arguing for the next 30-60 minutes. Comparing what you do and what Skip Bayless does isn’t name calling, it’s a comparison. Feel free to look up the definition.
As to the stupid tag line argument, WTF are you even arguing about this time?
I think personal bias leads you to take exception with the person rather than the point.
Bels and I were having a discussion about Trump only sending aid to "people he likes" and I replied "I didn't know he was such a fan of NY and Cali as he has sent them funds" instead of acknowledging that Trump has sent aid (perhaps the most to any states) to 2 states he "doesn't like". So instead of conceding the point, Bels "outstanding" retort was "He sent supplies not funds". I simply pointed out that supplies can be considered funds and it says so right in the dictionary. I then suggested it was best to end the back and forth because no ground was going to be conceded no matter how reasoned the reply.
So you take exception with one pointing to the semantics of funds versus supplies more so than the acknowledging the overall point. So much like my back and forth with Bels this one has ran it's course.
Do you call me Skip Bayless as a complement? Yes or no will suffice.
![[Image: bfine-guns2.png]](https://i.ibb.co/YBkDQJV/bfine-guns2.png)
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)