07-05-2020, 01:48 AM
(07-04-2020, 05:36 PM)bfine32 Wrote: It most likely would have not, but there's also debate on how much it would have reduced the spread. I remember Faucci being asked this long ago.
WTS. I'll concede those would have helped although we disagree with whom the testing should have occurred. If folks were to limit their "blame" to those simple facts then no one could say folks are placing an undue amount of blame on Trump, but when folks blame every thing he says and does on the spread, then...
I don't think anyone actually does that.
We hear blame heaped on Trump every day, yes, because he continues to flout his own administrations recommendations on mask use, keeps claiming it will just "go away soon," confuses his own administrations messaging--all this after destroying his own CDC and refusing to take early lock down measures.
Tomorrow he will continue this. Maybe again claim more testing explains the rising numbers, though more testing doesn't mean that in Wuhan or Italy. Then people will complain, and Trump defenders will attack them. But no responsible journalist or commentator will be connecting EVERY THING he says to the spread.
Or if you think that is the case, you ought to provide an example.
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)