08-16-2020, 05:39 PM
(08-16-2020, 04:57 PM)NATI BENGALS Wrote: Good points.
Doesn’t change my original thought that our country has a problem with mass shootings.
Thank you, and I agree. We just disagree on how to solve it.
Quote:And the ones that do them usually have some red flags. Reactionary policing allows the crimes to happen. I’m not afraid of trying a different approach to prevent them.
Sometimes yes, sometimes no. The Parkland shooter, for example, is a perfect example of shooting that should have been prevented. Lazy work by the school and local law enforcement, coupled with bad policy, hindered the ability to limit this psychos ability to commit his crime.
Quote:When I see some guns getting confiscated for no valid reason I’ll be with you claiming infringement.
I just gave you an example. We just disagree on what is valid.
Quote:I was looking for the part in the constitution where it talked about high capacity magazines and assault rifles but I guess I skimmed over it.
It's the "bear arms" part.
Quote:If we are allowed to arm ourselves to equally defend against own government then I want a nuclear sub and some trident nukes
I'm always amused when people try and counter what they label as extremism with an extremist example. I'm fine with the government restricting the access to weapons of mass destruction. A nuclear weapon has no use in personal defense. I am reasonably sure you could buy a military submarine though, just not a nuclear one.
