09-24-2020, 12:37 PM
(09-24-2020, 12:33 PM)GMDino Wrote: That's exactly what he meant. The issue is with him saying "if we get rid of the ballots" because he believes in a vast conspiracy that hasn't been even close to proven. Trump's administration has had court cases thrown out about the fraud due to lack of evidence.
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/judge-dismisses-trump-challenge-nevada-mail-voting-law-73150442
And his similar lawsuit in PA isn't going well for him either.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/trumps-war-on-mail-in-voting-suffers-setback-in-pennsylvania
So simply saying I don't have to answer that because I think I will win would be "acceptable" (I guess) but saying "we'll see" isn't. At least in my book. Whether it is Trump or not.
Yeah, I wasn't thinking of the "we'll see" but you make a good point about that. That is a bad answer to "if you lose, will you commit to a peaceful transfer of power".